
Georgia Tech: CDR Won't Work Without Radical Transparency
The carbon removal industry has a transparency problem. A new paper in Nature NPJ Climate Action from Georgia Tech geochemist Chris Reinhard and Yale’s Noah Planavsky argues that without a fundamental shift toward openness, CDR risks remaining a “niche, market-defined practice” when what the climate actually needs is a “trusted, scalable, and democratically governed solution.” That’s a polite way of saying: the current system is broken. The Problem With Proprietary Carbon Removal#Today’s voluntary carbon market works roughly like this: a startup claims it removed a certain amount of carbon, lists that amount for sale on a registry, and another company buys it to offset its emissions. The oversight is minimal. The data is often proprietary. The accounting methods vary wildly between providers. ...








