Captain Drawdown’s weekly Sunday selection — 48 candidate stories considered, 6-9 picked. Each link carries our 1-2 sentence take so you don’t have to click everything to know what’s there.

The week’s most useful signal came from a five-year scorecard on whether durable CDR has lived up to its 2021 promises — and the answer, predictably, is “uneven.” Around it, mineralization quietly emerged as the pathway with the most institutional momentum (Frontier, Carbon Direct, Arca, a new Quebec hub), while buyer-side activity continued to broaden beyond DAC into biochar and enhanced rock weathering (ERW) portfolios. Meanwhile Europe is sending mixed signals on carbon markets: Germany retiring allowances, IEEFA pushing back on power-sector CCS, and the EU inching toward letting international removals back in.

Reality check at year five

  • CDR.fyi BlogDurable CDR: Reality vs Expectations — A useful corrective to the 2021 hype cycle: CDR.fyi grades pathways on permanence, scale, measurement, reporting, and verification (MRV) and cost, and the headline is that biochar and ERW have outperformed expectations on deployment while DAC has lagged on cost curves. Worth reading before your next pathway allocation discussion.
  • Captain Drawdown570 pure-play CDR startups employ just 9,498 people combined — A sobering scale check: the entire pure-play CDR workforce is smaller than a single mid-size oil refinery’s headcount. If gigatonne ambitions are real, the talent pipeline is two orders of magnitude short.

Mineralization gets its institutional moment

Buyer side keeps broadening

Europe’s carbon market crosscurrents

  • Carbon HeraldGermany To Pull Carbon Credits Freed By 2024 Coal Phaseout From EU Market — Voluntary cancellation tightens EU ETS supply and is the clearest signal yet that Berlin wants the carbon price higher — relevant for any CDR economics modeled against EU compliance prices.
  • Carbon HeraldIEEFA Warns EU Against Costly Bet On CCS In Power Sector — The think-tank case that gas-plus-CCS is a stranded-asset trap matters for CDR because every euro that flows to power-sector CCS is a euro not flowing to removals — and the lobbying battle for the EU industrial decarbonization budget is now active.
  • DVNEInternational Removal Credits for the EU — The reopening of the international-credits debate inside EU climate policy is the file to watch this year; if removals get a carve-out under Article 6-style flows, it changes the addressable market for non-EU CDR suppliers materially.

Notable absence this week: no major DAC announcements, no new US policy news of substance, and remarkably little from the methodology bodies despite GHG Protocol naming its first CEO. The center of gravity is visibly shifting toward mineralization and toward European policy mechanics — and away from the DAC-dominated narrative that defined 2023-2024.