What This Page Shows

This Collaboration Atlas maps the research networks of 88,691 CDR scientists using co-authorship data from OpenAlex. The 335,701 co-authored papers reveal how researchers collaborate across disciplines, institutions, and countries — and which scientific communities are bridging the gap between different carbon dioxide removal methods.

How It Was Built

  1. Co-authorship networks: Every paper co-authored by CDR researchers creates a connection in the network
  2. Louvain community detection: Algorithmic clustering identified 138 distinct research communities that frequently publish together
  3. Pathway classification: Each community’s dominant method was determined by OpenAlex classification + LLM filtering
  4. Bridge scoring: Researchers with high network betweenness centrality — spanning multiple methods and geographies — are flagged as “bridge researchers”

What the Data Means

⚠️ Experimental Analysis

This collaboration analysis is highly experimental. Key limitations:

  • Based on co-authorship data from OpenAlex, which has known disambiguation issues
  • Community detection is algorithmic — detected clusters are approximate, not ground truth
  • "Bridge researcher" scores use network metrics (betweenness centrality), not editorial judgment
  • CDR pathway assignment uses automated classification (code-based patterns + LLM filtering)
  • Data is from the latest census snapshot — updated monthly

83,332
Connected Researchers
335,701
Co-authorship Links
138
Research Communities
3,739
Cross-Method Bridges

🔥 How CDR Methods Cross-Pollinate

This matrix shows co-authorship links between researchers from different CDR methods. Higher numbers = more collaboration.

Soil C.BiocharDACEWBECCSOceanGeneral
Soil C.192k15k2283.1k8141.5k5.8k
Biochar15k79k3855578594742.3k
DAC22838511k209144823.1k
EW3.1k55720915k301.0k1.8k
BECCS814859144306.8k442.4k
Ocean1.5k474821.0k4416k1.8k
General5.8k2.3k3.1k1.8k2.4k1.8k34k

🌍 Top Country Collaborations

The strongest international research partnerships in CDR, measured by co-authored papers.

China ↔ United States
12,975 papers
Australia ↔ China
3,842 papers
China ↔ United Kingdom
3,440 papers
China ↔ Germany
2,850 papers
United Kingdom ↔ United States
2,195 papers
China ↔ Hong Kong
2,141 papers
Canada ↔ China
2,050 papers
India ↔ United States
1,799 papers
China ↔ Spain
1,542 papers
China ↔ Pakistan
1,505 papers
Germany ↔ United States
1,278 papers
Canada ↔ United States
1,232 papers
China ↔ Japan
1,156 papers
Australia ↔ United States
1,013 papers
China ↔ France
967 papers
Germany ↔ United Kingdom
915 papers
China ↔ Singapore
892 papers
China ↔ Taiwan
846 papers
China ↔ South Korea
808 papers
South Korea ↔ United States
806 papers

🔗 Bridge Researchers

These researchers connect the most CDR methods through their co-authorship network — the rare people who span biochar, DAC, ocean CDR, and more. Click names to visit their researcher profile.

#ResearcherMethodsCo-authorsPrimaryInstitutionCountry
1Yakov Kuzyakov4542Soil CarbonGeorg-August-Universität GöttingenGermany
2Pete Smith5253Soil CarbonScotland's Climate Change Centre of Expertise (…United Kingdom
3Josep Peñuelas6302Soil CarbonConsejo Superior de Investigaciones CientíficasSpain
4Rattan Lal5190Soil CarbonThe Ohio State UniversityUnited States
5Noah J. Planavsky5164Enhanced WeatheringPlanetary Science InstituteUnited States
6Jordi Sardans6253Soil CarbonCREAF - Centre de Recerca Ecològica i Aplicacio…Spain
7Maurício Roberto Cherubin5153Soil CarbonUniversidade de São Paulo - Escola Superior de …Brazil
8Ondřej Mašek7146BiocharUniversity of EdinburghUnited Kingdom
9Phil Renforth7171General CDRHeriot-Watt UniversityUnited Kingdom
10David J. Beerling5178Enhanced WeatheringLeverhulme TrustUnited Kingdom
11Carlos Eduardo Pellegrino Cerri5140Soil CarbonUniversity of Sao PauloBrazil
12Kadambot H. M. Siddique3155Soil CarbonThe University of Western AustraliaAustralia
13Ji Chen4222Soil CarbonChinese Academy of Sciences Institute of Earth …China
14Philippe Ciais5171General CDRUniversité Paris-SaclayFrance
15Shaoshan An4127Soil CarbonInstitute of Soil and Water ConservationChina
16Andreas Oschlies3130Ocean CDRGEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research KielGermany
17Ulf Riebesell3105Ocean CDRGEOMAR Helmholtz-Zentrum für Ozeanforschung KielGermany
18Axel Don495Soil CarbonThünen-Institute of Climate-Smart AgricultureGermany
19Roland Bol5142Soil CarbonForschungszentrum JülichGermany
20Lennart T. Bach382Ocean CDRUniversity of TasmaniaAustralia
21Sara Vicca4123Enhanced WeatheringUniversity of AntwerpBelgium
22Yì Wáng5136BiocharChinese University of Hong KongHong Kong
23Chao Liang3159Soil CarbonZhejiang A & F UniversityChina
24Jens Hartmann5145Enhanced WeatheringUniversität HamburgGermany
25Scott X. Chang3130Soil CarbonUniversity of AlbertaCanada
26Zhouping Shangguan285Soil Carbon中国科学院水利部水土保持研究所China
27Hailong Wang6139Soil CarbonFoshan UniversityChina
28Daniel C.W. Tsang472BiocharHong Kong University of Science and TechnologyHong Kong
29Rajan Ghimire264Soil CarbonNew Mexico State UniversityUnited States
30Raymond R. Tan654General CDRHefei University of TechnologyChina
31Ram Swaroop Meena4100Soil CarbonBanaras Hindu UniversityIndia
32Yiqi Luo4152Soil CarbonCornell UniversityUnited States
33Weiqi Wang4135Soil CarbonFujian Normal UniversityChina
34Manuel Delgado‐Baquerizo4147Soil CarbonInstituto de Recursos Naturales y Agrobiología …Spain
35Tida Ge2130Soil CarbonNingbo UniversityChina
36Zhaoliang Song4138Soil CarbonTianjin UniversityChina
37Philip A.E. Pogge von Strandmann3115Enhanced WeatheringJohannes Gutenberg Universität MainzGermany
38Niall Mac Dowell357General CDRImperial College LondonUnited Kingdom
39Christopher T. Reinhard468General CDRGeorgia Institute of TechnologyUnited States
40Nanthi Bolan3120Soil CarbonThe University of Western AustraliaAustralia
41Jeroen Meersmans384Soil CarbonUniversity of LiègeBelgium
42Cornélia Rumpel387Soil CarbonCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueFrance
43Vishnu D. Rajput2108Soil CarbonSouthern Federal UniversityRussia
44Minggang Xu294Soil CarbonShanxi Agricultural UniversityChina
45Ian Power464Enhanced WeatheringTrent UniversityCanada
46Han Y. H. Chen395Soil CarbonInner Mongolia Agricultural UniversityCanada
47Peng Li378Soil CarbonHunan Normal UniversityChina
48Amit Kumar485Soil CarbonNanjing University of Information Science and T…China
49Jens Leifeld386General CDRFederal Office for AgricultureSwitzerland
50Dafeng Hui3110Soil CarbonTennessee State UniversityUnited States

🌐 Research Communities by CDR Method

The 50 detected communities, grouped by dominant pathway. Each cluster represents researchers who frequently co-author together, revealing natural research subfields within CDR.

Soil Carbon

Community 17: Soil Carbon (2,643 researchers)

🔬 Soil Carbon 76% 🌍 India (72%) 🏛️ Indian Council of Agricultural Research
Top researchers: Ram Swaroop Meena, Vishnu D. Rajput, Amit Kumar, Avijit Ghosh, Tatiana Minkina

Community 14: Soil Carbon (1,298 researchers)

🔬 Soil Carbon 82% 🌍 China (69%) 🏛️ Chinese Academy of Sciences
Top researchers: Yakov Kuzyakov, Shaoshan An, Chao Liang, Zhouping Shangguan, Tida Ge

Community 15: Soil Carbon (1,270 researchers)

🔬 Soil Carbon 69% 🌍 China (64%) 🏛️ Fujian Normal University
Top researchers: Josep Peñuelas, Jordi Sardans, Hailong Wang, Weiqi Wang, Zhaoliang Song

Biochar

Community 40: Biochar (623 researchers)

🔬 Biochar 65% 🌍 China (44%) 🏛️ Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Top researchers: Ondřej Mašek, Daniel C.W. Tsang, Yong Sik Ok, Chunfei Wu, Xinde Cao

Community 125: Biochar (582 researchers)

🔬 Biochar 51% 🌍 China (74%) 🏛️ Chinese Academy of Sciences
Top researchers: Xiaozhi Wang, Shengsen Wang, Andrew R. Zimmerman, Bin Gao, Xiaoyuan Yan

Community 104: Biochar (535 researchers)

🔬 Biochar 65% 🌍 China (30%) 🏛️ Hunan Agricultural University
Top researchers: Wei‐Hsin Chen, Eilhann E. Kwon, Su Shiung Lam, Cheng‐Di Dong, Kun‐Yi Andrew Lin

General CDR

Community 2: General CDR (1,577 researchers)

🔬 General CDR 52% 🌍 Germany (19%) 🏛️ International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis
Top researchers: Philippe Ciais, Andreas Oschlies, David P. Keller, Julia Pongratz, Benjamin K. Sovacool

Community 1: General CDR (874 researchers)

🔬 General CDR 50% 🌍 United States (31%) 🏛️ Imperial College London
Top researchers: Niall Mac Dowell, Haewon McJeon, Jay Fuhrman, David T. Ho, Olivier Bahn

Community 20: General CDR (470 researchers)

🔬 General CDR 34% 🌍 United Kingdom (13%) 🏛️ RWTH Aachen University
Top researchers: Marco Mazzotti, Katja Fennel, Mohamed Pourkashanian, Filip Johnsson, Niklas von der Aßen

Ocean CDR

Community 43: Ocean CDR (939 researchers)

🔬 Ocean CDR 72% 🌍 China (28%) 🏛️ Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Top researchers: Nianzhi Jiao, Wei‐Jun Cai, Chinmayee V. Subban, Matthew D. Eisaman, Jessica Cross

Community 49: Ocean CDR (645 researchers)

🔬 Ocean CDR 35% 🌍 Germany (22%) 🏛️ Universität Hamburg
Top researchers: Ulf Riebesell, Lennart T. Bach, Sara Vicca, Jens Hartmann, Nikolas Hagemann

Enhanced Weathering

Community 5: Enhanced Weathering (684 researchers)

🔬 Enhanced Weathering 45% 🌍 United States (32%) 🏛️ Universidade de Brasília
Top researchers: Noah J. Planavsky, David J. Beerling, Christopher T. Reinhard, Rachael H. James, Xavier Dupla

Community 6: Enhanced Weathering (632 researchers)

🔬 Enhanced Weathering 45% 🌍 United Kingdom (17%) 🏛️ Heriot-Watt University
Top researchers: Phil Renforth, Ian Power, Rafael M. Santos, Spyros Foteinis, Sasha Wilson

Community 109: Enhanced Weathering (422 researchers)

🔬 Enhanced Weathering 58% 🌍 China (44%) 🏛️ China University of Geosciences
Top researchers: Philip A.E. Pogge von Strandmann, Thierry Adatte, Zheng Gang Guo, David J. Wilson, Benjamin Mills

BECCS

No research communities detected for BECCS in this dataset.

DAC

No research communities detected for DAC in this dataset.


🌐 CDR Method Collaboration Chord

How do CDR research methods connect through co-authorship? This chord diagram shows the flow of collaboration between pathways — thicker ribbons mean more co-authored papers linking researchers across methods.

Soil Carbon Biochar DAC Enhanced Weathering BECCS Ocean CDR General CDR

Hover over ribbons to see co-authorship counts. Ribbon thickness is proportional to collaboration volume.