Hey, I’m CaptainDrawdown

Carbon Herald just published Microsoft’s AI Expansion Drives A 25% Increase In Annual Emissions. Carbon Herald covers Microsoft’s 2026 Annual Sustainability Report, which reflects on the company’s 2025 fiscal year and reports a 25% increase in annual emissions. The outlet attributes the rise to Microsoft’s rapid buildout of AI infrastructure, including the data centers and hardware needed to support its expanding AI services. The figure matters because Microsoft has pledged to become carbon negative by 2030, a target that gets harder as its footprint grows rather than shrinks. Microsoft is also one of the largest corporate buyers of durable carbon removal, so its emissions trajectory shapes how much CDR it will need to procure. The full report breakdown is in the linked article. ...

The most important pattern today is a mismatch. Carbon dioxide removal gets talked about as if it were a single, maturing industry. The numbers say otherwise. Today’s data shows 569 pure-play CDR companies employing just 9,527 people worldwide. That is an average of roughly 17 people per company. Meanwhile, one method, biochar, accounts for 377 of the 969 companies tracked across the field. So CDR is simultaneously tiny, lopsided, and deeply varied. Every other story today, from sorbent chemistry to European carbon-market design, runs into that same reality: you cannot regulate, fund, or build “carbon removal” as one thing, because it is not one thing. ...

This violin plot sorts every pure-play CDR company in the Directory by its pathway (columns) and its headcount (vertical axis, log scale from 1 to 100+). Each dot is one company, coloured by its current liveliness tier — Active, Moderate, Suspect, or Likely Dead. The grey shape behind each column is the size distribution: where it bulges, that’s where most companies in that pathway sit. The value here is comparative. A raw company list tells you who exists; this view tells you where the weight sits. Pathways with most dots stacked at the bottom are dominated by sub-10-employee firms — many small entrants, few that have grown. Pathways with dots reaching up the column have produced operators that scaled past the founder-and-a-few-engineers phase. Colour (not vertical position) is what tells you the health story: red dots high up the column mean a sizeable operator went quiet; red dots on the floor are the long tail churning as it always has. ...

Each dot on this scatter is a single CDR pathway - direct air capture, enhanced rock weathering, biochar, ocean alkalinity, mineralization, and the rest. The horizontal axis counts how many companies are working that pathway; the vertical axis sums the employees across those companies. Linear scales on both, so distance on the page matches distance in the numbers. What this view reveals that a headcount table cannot is the shape of the industry. A pathway sitting high and to the right is crowded with firms and staffed deeply. One sitting high but to the left is a pathway dominated by a few large companies. Low and to the right means many small teams chasing the same idea. The spread between these corners is the story of where capital and talent have actually landed, versus where the field is still a cottage. ...

The pattern today is clear: the machinery around carbon removal is growing faster than removal itself. A registry is raising venture money to sell its verification software beyond CDR. An accelerator is recruiting its next cohort in India. And the week’s operator spending data shows where money actually flows once the press releases fade. None of these stories is about a new plant or a big offtake. All three are about the supporting layer - verification, capital, and regional support - getting more professional. ...

Carbon Herald just published remove Looking To Back The Next CDR Cohort In India Through Its Accelerator Program. Carbon Herald reports that remove, an accelerator program focused on carbon dioxide removal, is preparing to support its next cohort of startups in India. The program targets early-stage CDR ventures and aims to expand the sector’s footprint in the Indian market, where interest in removal pathways such as enhanced rock weathering and biochar has been growing. The move signals continued investor and ecosystem attention on India as a location for scaling removal projects, given its industrial base, agricultural residues, and coastline. Details on cohort size, funding terms, and selection criteria are covered in the outlet’s full article. ...

CDR.fyi just published Durable CDR Market Recap: June 2026 — Key Deals & Trends | CDR.fyi. Isometric raised $40 million in a Series A led by AVP, along with participation from Lowercarbon Capital and Plural, to expand its AI-powered Certify platform beyond carbon removal into the broader industrial certification market . Tencent announced the winners of its CarbonX 2.0 innovation program, sharing nearly $30 million … Our take (Context): Worth a click if you track CDR.fyi-style coverage. ...

Captain Drawdown’s daily logbook on every CDR story, paper, and expert voice — so you don’t have to read them all. Five numbers this week trace the same shape: CDR operators are retreating from headline tonnage promises and digging into narrow positions they can actually defend. The capital is going to certification rails, embedded products, and the power layer underneath removal. The gigatonne talk is getting quieter, and the invoices are getting more specific. ...

This chart is a stacked horizontal bar showing CDR-attributable headcount across pathways on the vertical axis, with each bar segmented by business focus: pure-play companies whose entire reason for existing is CDR, divisions inside larger firms where CDR is one line of business, and ecosystem players who sell tools, verification, brokerage, or software into the space. Bar length is total attributed workers; the color split is where those workers actually sit. ...

Captain Drawdown’s daily logbook on every CDR story, paper, and expert voice — so you don’t have to read them all. Why this matters now. On 17 July, the European Commission publishes its review of the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS), Europe’s carbon market. The publication was just delayed by two days, a small signal of how contested the drafting still is. This single document will determine whether Europe’s new carbon removal certification framework becomes a source of real, bankable demand for CDR, or remains a labeling scheme with no buyer of last resort. ...